Owner: Laura (Ops) · Reviewer: Purple · Department: Operations · Status: Live · Version: 1.0
Effective Date: 2026-06-13 · Last Reviewed: 2026-06-13 · Next Review Date: 2026-09-13
Source of Truth: this validation + code audits · Maturity: 4 (Operational)
Simulated execution under pressure, using only the wiki.
| Scenario | Outcome | Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Class I recall at 2am (new employee) | PASS w/ caveat | Recall Execution is step-clear; employee can delist on-platform + trigger notifications. Caveat: 'who approves' is provisional; off-platform action is the vendor's. |
| DSHS inspector arrives | PASS w/ caveat | Inspection Day Response → generate audit pack + notify Ayisha. Caveat: who-speaks authority provisional. |
| NOV received, deadline clock | PASS | NOV Response → record, decide, respond before response_due_at. |
| Customer reports illness from a product | PARTIAL | CS rep finds escalation (§17.4) but there is no complaint/CAPA intake (§300.208 gap) — escalate manually to Compliance. |
| Vendor's license lapses | PASS | Auto Seal suspension (Seal Doctrine §4.1) + delist; vendor cure path in Seal Terms §7. |
| Vendor disputes a suspension | PASS | Seal Doctrine dispute/reinstatement (§7) is clear. |
Every scenario is navigable from the wiki; the two caveats (recall/inspection authority) are answer-sheet-dependent, and the one PARTIAL (illness/complaint) is a platform gap, not a doc gap.
Program Closeout Report · Final Scorecard · Remediation Plan · Home